← Dashboard

Compare Trademark Strategies

Select two trademark owners to compare their filing strategies side by side.

USPTO data refreshed July 11, 2026

What this does: Pick any two USPTO trademark owners and we'll lay their portfolios side by side — total filings, unique marks, NICE class coverage, filing velocity, and our proprietary Expansion Score. Use it to benchmark category moves, spot defensive vs offensive filing patterns, and find brands that are quietly expanding before they announce it.

vs

Which trademark comparisons are people running?

Which owners file the most trademarks at the USPTO?

Select any two owners from the list to compare their trademark strategies.

Owner Filings Action
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. 2,184
IGT 1,648
EVERI GAMES INC 901
Apple Inc 888
LIGHT & WONDER, INC. 742
Xerox Corporation 636
Games Global USA Inc. 606
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC 570
HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises, LLC 534
CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY 509
MATTEL INC. 452
L'OREAL USA S/D, INC. 436
Walmart Apollo , LLC 419
The Upper Deck Company 402
Eli Lilly and Company 379
WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT LLC 369
Amazon Technologies Inc. 355
Aristocrat Technologies Inc 347
IGT CANADA SOLUTIONS ULC 322
KAZ EUROPE SÀRL 314
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft 307
Universal City Studios LLC 303
GENERAL MOTORS LLC 303
Euro Games Technology Ltd. 302
E. & J. GALLO WINERY 295
L'Oreal 273
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD 263
Bumble Holding Limited 260
AGS LLC 259
LG H&H Co., LTD. 254
KING SHOW GAMES INC. 254
Glaxo Group Limited 243
Phoenix Intangibles Holding Company 240
Disney Enterprises, Inc 237
FERRARA CANDY COMPANY 236
Novartis AG 232
Target Brands, Inc. 227
DIVERSEY INC. 225
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. 219
Home Depot Product Authority, LLC 211
INNOVATIVE WATER CARE, LLC 209
PEI LICENSING, LLC 207
WRANGLER APPAREL CORP 202
Columbia Insurance Company 201
JYP ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION 195
Jim Beam Brands Co 194
THE WINE GROUP LLC 193
Konami Gaming, Inc. 191
BASF SE 190
SOUTHWIRE COMPANY, LLC 188

FAQ: comparing trademark strategies

How does WikiTrademarks compare two trademark owners?

We pull every USPTO filing attributed to each owner, normalise the entity names (companies file under dozens of subtly different strings), and lay the two portfolios side by side: total filings, unique marks, NICE class distribution, filing velocity over the trailing 12 and 24 months, and the WikiTrademarks Expansion Score for each.

What is the Expansion Score and how is it calculated?

The Expansion Score is a proprietary metric for how aggressively a brand is reaching into new categories. It combines NICE class breadth, filing velocity, and the rate of cross-class movement. A high score signals a portfolio that is actively entering new product or service categories, not just defending the ones it already holds.

Which comparisons are most useful for brand strategy research?

Direct category competitors are the highest signal — Apple vs Samsung, Nike vs Adidas, Mars vs Hershey, Coca-Cola vs PepsiCo. Cross-category comparisons are useful when you want to benchmark expansion speed between unrelated industries (a media holding company vs a CPG conglomerate, for example).

How fresh is the trademark data used for comparisons?

WikiTrademarks ingests the USPTO daily bulk data feed. Most filings appear within 24 to 48 hours of being public. Office actions, registrations, and abandonments follow the same cadence. See the USPTO Trademarks Data products for the upstream source.

Can I compare an individual filer (pro se) against a company?

Yes — any USPTO owner can be compared, including pro se filers. See the Pro Se Filers index for solo filers who have filed without an attorney.