SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS

1 total filings · 5 classes · Active since Jul 2024

Watch Brand
Download PDF Free with sign-in. Joins our weekly trademark roundup.

SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS holds 1 USPTO trademark filings across 5 NICE classes. The largest concentration is in Class 9 (Electronics & Software) with 1 filings. The WikiTrademarks Expansion Score is 7/100, low — the brand is focused on defending its existing categories rather than expanding.

USPTO data refreshed September 30, 2026

Protect or track "SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS"

Watch this name and we'll alert you when anyone files a similar mark.

Informational only, not a legal opinion. Consult a trademark attorney before filing or enforcing.

Own this brand? Claim the profile to add your logo, story, and website.

Sign in to claim

How is SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS filing trademarks, and where is the portfolio expanding?

Filing Velocity (24 Months)

Oct 2024 Sep 2026

Activity Timeline

No activity recorded yet.

Recent Filings

Serial No. Mark Filing Date Status Classes Owner
98663721 SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS Jul 24, 2024 Pending 009 Electronics & Software 010 Medical Devices 016 Paper & Printed Goods 035 Advertising & Business 044 Medical & Beauty Services Specsavers Optical Superstores Limited
See how ChatGPT talks about SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS Beta

Weekly visibility reports showing how ChatGPT mentions SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS, where you rank in the answer, the sentiment of the mention, and which sources ChatGPT cites.

Join waitlist →

FAQ: SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS trademark portfolio

What trademarks does SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS hold?

SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS holds 1 USPTO trademark filings across 5 NICE classes. The largest concentration is in Class 9 (Electronics & Software), Class 10 (Medical Devices), Class 16 (Paper & Printed Goods). The most recent filings are registered to Specsavers Optical Superstores Limited.

How many trademarks does SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS have at the USPTO?

WikiTrademarks tracks 1 USPTO trademark filings attributed to SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS. The brand has been actively filing since July 2024. The count updates daily as new filings are indexed from the USPTO bulk data feed.

In which NICE classes does SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS file most often?

SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS's most active class is NICE Class 9 (Electronics & Software), with 1 filings. The full distribution across all 5 classes is shown in the Nice Class Distribution panel on this page.

Who owns the SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS trademark?

The most recent filings under the SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS mark are registered to Specsavers Optical Superstores Limited. Trademark ownership can shift through assignments — see the Ownership & Assignment History section on this page for the full chain of title.

Is SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS expanding into new categories?

The current WikiTrademarks Expansion Score for SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS is 7 out of 100, which is low — the brand is focused on defending its existing categories rather than expanding. The score combines NICE class breadth, filing velocity, and the rate of cross-class movement from the brand's filing history.

How can I track new SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS trademark filings?

Click the Watch Brand button at the top of this page to add SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS to your Watchlist. New filings show up on your WikiTrademarks dashboard within 24 to 48 hours of being public, alongside any class expansions, status changes, or assignment events.

More on this portfolio: Compare SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS to another owner · Browse all NICE classes · Most valuable brands

Community notes

0 notes
Sign in to add a note

Share what you know about SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS and help the next person researching it.

No notes yet. Be the first to add what you know about SHOULD'VE GONE TO SPECSAVERS.